Aug 07 2010
Barakovites Verses Americans
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” These words from the Book of God are the very cornerstone upon which our government rested, and our culture reposed. I use the past tense because when we elected a Muslim to lead the nation, we deserted both. When Obama declared to the world that we are not a Christian nation, he spoke the only honest words he ever said. Though I agree with Obama, I am outraged that he would broadcast this to our avowed enemies. Many people in the nation, like the ancient Corinthians, are “called to be saints,” but we, like the ancient Corinthians, live in a heathen nation, governed by a heathen administration that has denied our heritage.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” These immortal words did not emerge from the Book of God, but they came from pure minds that were saturated with the Book of God. They could have well come from the mind of God. These words place the Nigerian child, born in absolute poverty, on the same level, in the eyes of God, as the child born to the CEO of a great company. God loves that child as much as the CEO’s child, and will just as quickly redeem him, and answer his prayers.
Muslims indeed believe in a Creator. The Qur’an is virtually the same as our Old Testament. It even speaks of God by plural pronouns. However, Muslims went astray by accepting the Hadath, the mumblings of Muhammad. The Catholic Church went astray in a similar way by placing the dogma of the church above the Book of God, and giving the traditions more authority than the Book of God. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, also erred because they accepted the Book of Mormon, and made it superior to the Book of God. Jews had made the same error at the time of Jesus. He condemned their practice of making the Law “of none effect by your tradition.” (Matthew 15:6). We Baptists are making a similar error by adopting the hundreds of versions of the Bible that flood the market: each new version worse than the one before. Why can’t things get better instead of worse? Why do men have such an aversion to truth?
The Book of God begins with the Creator, and goes through the death of Jesus, and His resurrection, to the judgment. This is what Paul did in his sermon on Mars Hill (Acts 117:24; 31). Satan is sly enough to persuade men to write stuff that other people will believe, and cause them to turn from the truths of their Creator to a lie.
Too many people have believed the lie of another religious fanatic who wrote stuff that began a new religion. That man was Charles Darwin, and his lie is that God does not exist at all, and the cosmos came into being by an explosion. (Dr. Isaac Asimov said it was an explosion of a molecule, but where did the molecule come from?). Millions of people in the United States have been duped by this religion and its gospel. Their gospel is called evolution. Theological evolution, the idea that God used billions of years of evolution to bring the world into being, is only one other attempt to reconcile science with the Book of God. It is not worth discussing.
The problem is this: Since the government of this nation is built upon the truth that a Creator has granted us our freedoms, people who reject God’s existence cannot claim to be Americans. They will reject this idea, but their actions are geared to the destruction of the American dream, and installation of a totalitarian, or socialist government of some sort, but without God. This is what we are being governed by. This government was elected essentially by the sort of people I designate as Barakovites. It is painful to come to this conclusion because I suspect some of my best friends, and maybe even some relatives, fall into the category of Barakovites. Some of these people seem devout, and most of them are good, decent citizens of the nation.
This essay is not meant to be a political thing. I am convinced that Republicans have governed us as unconstitutionally as Democrats. In fact, we have not been governed by the tenets of the Constitution since way back: maybe the second or third administration. I know it ended with Jackson, and his “to the victor go the spoils” ideas.
I have pointed out before that no Saint (saved person) can vote for a Democrat, and please God at the same time. The Democratic Party stand on women’s rights can be found at Appendix 1 at the end of this essay. The rationale for this remark is simple: God only can create (give life) life, and only God (and the state to whom God gave the right) has the right to take it. People must make serious choices in their voting privileges:
- Devotion to God, or devotion to party
- Loyalty to God or loyalty to union
- Vows to clubs, lodges, etc., or vows to God
- Is my race more important than my membership in the family of God?
This list could be greatly expanded, but there is not room here even if I could think of them all. The reason you cannot please God by voting for a Democrat is because the Democrat is bound to the position given in the Appendix, and God is not the author of death, nor the Author of confusion. I used to make a great many people angry by scrawling “Unborn Babies are People, Too” on the back of my truck. I will not argue the case here because all people should know by now that abortion has no place in the Constitution or the Book of God.
My prayer: “Heavenly Father, Thy kingdom come: Thy will be done this day. Our nation is steeped in sin and wickedness. The selfishness of evolutionary dogma and atheism has caused our people to forget Thee, and all the blessings (good things) Thou hast given us. Many people in this country have placed government in their hearts in place of their Creator. I ask Thee, Father, to help me and my family to behave according to Thy will: quietly, harmlessly, lovingly with no malice toward any man, and obedient to our government. This administration holds power because it is Thy will, and we pray that Thou wilt remove it. But people have the sort of government they deserve. Give me and mine the grace to love people, and rebuke them when they are wrong. Protect Thy children from this wicked and untoward generation. In the name of Jesus Christ, Thy crucified, resurrected Son I pray. Amen.”
Appendix 1
Reproductive rights
The Democratic Party believes that all women should have access to birth control, and supports public funding of contraception for poor women. The Democratic Party, in its platform in 2000 and 2004, called for abortion to be “safe, legal and rare”—namely, keeping it legal by rejecting laws that allow governmental interference in abortion decisions, and reducing the number of abortions by promoting both knowledge of reproduction and contraception, and incentives for adoption.
The Democratic Party opposes attempts to reverse the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade which recognized abortion as a right. As a matter of the right to privacy and of gender equality, many Democrats believe all women should have the ability to choose without governmental interference. They believe that each woman, conferring with her conscience, has the right to choose for herself whether abortion is morally correct. Many Democrats believe that poor women should have a right to publically funded abortions.
Some Democrats explicitly oppose the legality of abortion on moral grounds, including former Pennsylvania Governor Robert P. Casey and Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley.
A substantial number of party members have been shifting to the center on this issue. Some believe in programs to make abortions less frequent as well as making sure the procedure is legal and available. Senator Clinton of New York said in early 2005 that the opposing sides should find “common ground” to prevent unwanted pregnancies and ultimately reduce abortions, which she called a “sad, even tragic choice to many, many women.”